Federal judge drops environmental analysis of planned massive gold mine in western Alaska • Alaska Beacon
6 mins read

Federal judge drops environmental analysis of planned massive gold mine in western Alaska • Alaska Beacon

Opponents of the proposed Donlin gold mine in western Alaska won a key victory Monday when a federal judge ruled that regulators who issued the permit needed to build the project failed to adequately consider the risk of a catastrophic release of mine waste.

U.S. District Court Judge Sharon Gleason agreed with tribal plaintiffs who argued that the environmental study that led to the federal permit for the Donlin mine illegally omitted analysis of the effects of the failure of a large tailings dam.

“I think this is a great victory for the tribes and the region,” said Hannah Foster, a lawyer with the environmental group Earthjustice, which represents tribal governments fighting the mine.

At issue was the environmental impact statement that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers relied on when it issued a key permit in 2018 to build a gold mine, one of the largest in the world.

The environmental impact statement needed to fully analyze the possibility of a breach of the 471-foot-high dam, which is designed to hold hundreds of millions of tons of tailings, which are crushed pieces of rock left over from mineral extraction.

The environmental impact statement indicated that the risk of catastrophic failure was 0.5% per year, or 2% over 20 years. However, the Corps failed to take into account the outcome of such a spill, an omission that Gleason argues violates the National Environmental Policy Act and the Alaska National Lands Protection Act.

“To borrow an analogy from the plaintiffs and put these numbers into perspective, the same odds of risking a plane crash would likely discourage almost anyone from flying. “Because a tailings leak greater than 0.5% of the total tailings volume is reasonably foreseeable, a larger leak should have been included in the (final environmental impact statement),” Gleason said in her ruling.

Gleason’s ruling did not result in a complete invalidation of the permit, as the plaintiffs had requested. Instead, it gave both sides the opportunity to further discuss how to respond to shortcomings in the environmental impact statement.

Representatives of the six tribal governments that filed suit to overturn the Corps’ permit welcomed the court’s ruling, even though it was only a partial victory.

“The threat from the Donlin gold mine has been hanging over us for many years, posing unacceptable risks to the health of our lands, waters, fish, wildlife and our people. We are relieved and happy that the judge is requiring a closer look at the mine’s impacts and tailings failure risks, Walter Jim, chairman of the Orutsararmiut Indigenous Council, said in a statement.

Bev Hoffman of Bethel attends a rally against the Donlin gold mine and other resource extraction projects on October 19, 2023. Hoffman is a longtime community activist and Yup'ik leader who opposes the mine. The protest took place on the street in front of the Dena'ina Civic and Convention Center in Anchorage, where the annual convention of the Federation of Alaska Natives was held. (Photo: Yereth Rosen/Alaska Beacon)
Bev Hoffman of Bethel attends a rally against the Donlin gold mine and other resource extraction projects on October 19, 2023. Hoffman is a longtime community activist and Yup’ik leader who opposes the mine. The protest took place on the street in front of the Dena’ina Civic and Convention Center in Anchorage, where the annual convention of the Federation of Alaska Natives was held. (Photo: Yereth Rosen/Alaska Beacon)

“From the beginning, our primary concern has been the Kuskokwim River, which has sustained our customary and traditional practices for generations. We are grateful that the courts recognize the importance of this sustainable resource that we have always relied on and that must be protected by law,” Boris Epchook, president of the Organized Village of Kwethluk, said in a statement.

The other tribal plaintiffs are the Tuluksak Native Council, the Eek Native Village, the Chevak Traditional Council and the Kwigillingok Native Village.

The Gleason ruling provided some victories for federal regulators and, by extension, mine developers. It rejected the plaintiff’s claims that the permit issued by the Corps and the permit issued by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management did not adequately address the mine’s impact on the health of residents in the region or the way in which barge traffic associated with the mines could affect water quality and fish in the river Kuskokwim.

The Donlin Gold project is jointly owned by Barrick Gold US Inc. and NovaGold Resources Alaska Inc. The mine is located on land owned by Kuskokwim Corp., a local Native corporation, and will extract mineral resources owned by Calista Corp., a regional Native corporation for the Yukon-Kuskokwim area of ​​Alaska.

The mine is controversial in this largely Yup’ik region, with supporters touting its economic potential and opponents citing possible damage to the Kuskokwim River region and to salmon and other resources people depend on for food and culture.

In a statement, Donlin Gold LLC defended the planning process and resulting permits.

“Donlin Gold is committed to developing the Donlin Gold project in a responsible manner that protects the environment and the fundamental way of life in the Yukon-Kuskokwim region,” interim CEO Enric Fernandez said in a statement. “We are currently reviewing the court’s decision and considering our options.”

The statement, which highlighted the mixed nature of the Gleason ruling, defended the planning process and the Donlin Gold tailings dam project.

“We believe that the release scenario analyzed in the Environmental Impact Statement (“EIS”) was appropriate based on the specific facts regarding the Donlin Tailings Facility. We lost on a narrow issue in which the District Court of Alaska found that a larger tailings spill should have been considered,” Fernandez said in a statement.

Other legal challenges against the mine are pending in court in Alaska. These lawsuits seek to revoke certain state permits for the mine. A hearing in one of these cases was held on August 30 in Anchorage.

SEE THE MORNING HEADLINES.